bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory140.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 09:06
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 188
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 533
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 550GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 73 100 99 101 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 496
Write 137
Mixed 244
SusWrite 102
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 19.8
88% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 23.3
44% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 80%
Virtual HD 550GB
512GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 267 250 226 334 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 207
Mixed 288
SusWrite 280
50% 218 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 30.1
70% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 243
178% 229 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54%
Great: 80%
Disco virtual de Microsoft 137GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 35 34 31 43 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 92.5
Write 66.3
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 38.6
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2
308% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 256GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 31751 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 31.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 22.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback