Today's hottest deals

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory85.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 15:48
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 164
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 602
52% 445 Pts
64-Core 1,597
99% 1,597 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.2
76% 98 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 96.9
78% 95.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 338 328 325 329 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 460
Mixed 398
SusWrite 347
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 43.5
140% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 352
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
266GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1592 1028 613 614 615 613 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,857
Write 1,659
Mixed 722
SusWrite 846
283% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 49.4
169% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 535
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 446
338% 457 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 199%
Great: 254%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
917GB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 112 111 114 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
306% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 105%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 120 115 124 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 154
Write 171
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 122
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
246% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 131%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$185
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 123 126 126 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 120%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 88
Write 83.8
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 85.9
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 100 98 101 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 100
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 99.2
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
159% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 63%
SP SDXC USB 3.0 253GB
219GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 31 34 32 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Read 88
Write 64.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 32.7
66% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 6.1
415% 7.33 MB/s
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 162 161 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 154
Write 123
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 163
181% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 H... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 29.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback