Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '21 at 13:18
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 524
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 64.6
55% 67.5 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 62.2
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 323 336 334 330 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 342
Write 55.6
Mixed 164
SusWrite 308
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 26.3
106% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 112
109% 174 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 99%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
94GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 227 231 256 256 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 420
Write 242
Mixed 256
SusWrite 232
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 15.7
94% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 23.9
43% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$48
1TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 171 175 173 172 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 138
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 170
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 24.9
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 27.4
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 66%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
982GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 36.5
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 36
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 59%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
931GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 298 305 313 312 312 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 317
Write 312
Mixed 286
SusWrite 289
409% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 21.8
1,675% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 28.2
DQ Mixed 25.5
1,919% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 191%
Great: 411%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F94 U32R59x
Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback