Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 142
57% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 422
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 60.6
31% 52.4 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 42.4
39% 49.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 223 216 202 206 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 405
Write 272
Mixed 200
SusWrite 214
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 27
98% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 120
112% 175 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 91%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
150GB free
Firmware: UF22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 137 129 131 144 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 437
Write 362
Mixed 156
SusWrite 161
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 10.5
60% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 73.2
DQ Mixed 18.9
34% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 22" 1280 720 HWP26A8 HP w2207
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback