Today's hottest deals

Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 08:24
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 181
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 621
57% 476 Pts
64-Core 1,635
101% 1,635 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 487 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5.7
5% 5.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 553 548 539 542 542 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 536
Mixed 531
SusWrite 552
121% 536 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 56.1
173% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 589
442% 595 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 136%
Great: 496%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
662GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 247 247 249 247 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 408
Write 396
Mixed 389
SusWrite 247
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 37
128% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 347
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
237GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 245 246 248 247 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 418
Write 392
Mixed 337
SusWrite 247
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 33.6
122% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
432GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 247 246 249 248 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 408
Write 402
Mixed 371
SusWrite 247
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 37.2
137% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 246
213% 316 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 23.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 8 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2470 2470W
Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback