Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 646
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Zotac(19DA 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1367 MHz, MLim: 1727 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 835 390 286 270 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1578
Write 1,751
Mixed 1,309
SusWrite 572
292% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 62.2
204% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 752
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 621
457% 608 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 189%
Great: 276%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
244GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 83 84 83 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 133
Write 131
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 83.2
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Constellation CS ISE 1TB
291GB free
Firmware: CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 141 138 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 167
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 138
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 3R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 31% 48 27 7 60 28.8" 2560 1080 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback