Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 03:29
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 434
60% 443 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 65
Parallax 93.6
58% 76.4 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 47.5
49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 116 63 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 474
Write 134
Mixed 331
SusWrite 127
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 29.6
124% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 169
150% 223 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$27
219GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69% Good
Read 122
Write 113
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
491GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 129 129 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 52.5
Write 106
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 125
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
213% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 71%
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD
19GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 22 31 20 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 37.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 24.9
42% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 9.2
802% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 9.6
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 10
774% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSB.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 34.7
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 3R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 46% 37 330 268 75 23" 1920 1080 ACR0582 HA230
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback