| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+ |
| Memory | 60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150304 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 18 '21 at 13:45 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
55.3%
Above average
|
61% 114 Pts
|
62% 531 Pts
|
144% 2,323 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.5%
Very good
|
72% 86.9 fps
|
68% 85.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 665 672 674 665 662 MB/s
|
205%
Outstanding
|
332% 1,489 MB/s
|
163% 59.7 MB/s
|
381% 512 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GB
8 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
114% 39.8 GB/s
|
27% 9.57 GB/s
|
24% 166 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | MSI30A3 MSI MP271Q |
Typical X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+ Builds (Compare 6 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DRE-TF+/X9DR7-TF+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 2x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples | 1x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 980-TiNvidia $449Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Average | Total price: $474 |