Today's hottest deals

Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 132
59% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 432
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 62
55% 65.4 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 61.6
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 200 209 207 208 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 448
Write 286
Mixed 227
SusWrite 207
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 41.6
142% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 222
177% 247 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 106%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
764GB free
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 395 407 406 421 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 359
Write 103
Mixed 336
SusWrite 393
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 34.1
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 173
144% 206 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
755GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 170 170 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 159
Mixed 102
SusWrite 168
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 109%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
363GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 96 96 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 96.3
Write 96.3
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 94.4
112% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 14
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 50 72.3" 1280 701 TSB0108 TOSHIBA-TV
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback