Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory29.4 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 05:53
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 153
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 486
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 1.6
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 334 341 333 337 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 319
Write 349
Mixed 109
SusWrite 338
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 2.5
11% 4.37 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 7.7
8% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HUS72402CLAR2000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: C250
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 187
Write 44.8
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 45.1
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST330006CLAR3000 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: YS1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 43 44 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 154
Write 42.9
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 43.3
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
16GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 5.3 5 5.6 5.5 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.9
8% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270CH0-CH9 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback