Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 21:55
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 268
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 767
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 135
Parallax 290
119% 190 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 140
Splatting 167
144% 178 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 122%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
634GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 458 464 458 470 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 483
Mixed 381
SusWrite 463
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 50.3
181% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 303
242% 340 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 120%
Great: 137%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
171GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 129 14 190 182 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 457
Write 349
Mixed 278
SusWrite 185
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 19.2
70% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 41.7
49% 85 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
36GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 258 126 49 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 480
Mixed 433
SusWrite 154
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 55.9
194% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 234
213% 326 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 159 159 158 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 134
Write 108
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 157
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
3GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 14.2
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 4
16% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.4
135% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 35
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0628 ED273 A
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback