Lenovo CNI_SUPTHM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo CNI_SUPTHM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Type2 Product
Memory119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '21 at 23:37
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 64 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 64.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
85% 162 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 1,104
98% 830 Pts
64-Core 7,264
450% 7,264 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 12BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 222
Parallax 267
187% 240 fps
MRender 287
Gravity 245
Splatting 206
197% 246 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 173%
Great: 173%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
641GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 74 77 69 98 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 168
Write 155
Mixed 100
SusWrite 93.4
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
190% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GR7MJR4N-WM 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 25% 4 110 7 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI249A ASUS VS247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback