Amazon m5zn.metal

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmazon m5zn.metal  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon Not Specified
Memory186.5 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.9 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1,013
91% 770 Pts
64-Core 4,252
263% 4,252 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 32GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 128 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB3-CVF 12x16GB
12 of 24 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 73.2
MC Mixed 53.2
173% 60.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 144%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 9 0 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $365WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback