Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 14:46
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 436
41% 343 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
ASRock(1849 5001) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 21.6
13% 21.7 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 20
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 55 45 44 43 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 79.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 45.4
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 68%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
22GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 59 58 59 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39% Below average
Read 75.8
Write 63.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 59.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
134GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 60 59 61 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 103
Write 95.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 60.1
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
785GB free, PID 55ae
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 27.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 25.4
36% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 6.2
442% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback