Today's hottest deals

Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 13:49
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 549
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 49.6
Parallax 64.8
43% 55.7 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 14.1
21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 219 5.5 113 125 6.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 438
Write 416
Mixed 385
SusWrite 126
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 0.5
18% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
447GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 179 179 176 178 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 178
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 1319 KRE-D3U1600M/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 1319 KRE-D3U1600M/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 2R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 29% 28 99 5 75 22" 1680 1050 GSM57FB E2210
Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback