Today's hottest deals

Axioo NEON HNM MODEL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAxioo NEON HNM MODEL  (all builds)
MotherboardAXIOO NEON HNM MODEL
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 52.4
34% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 95.6
8-Core 132
14% 114 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9981) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 27 16 8.7 23 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 8.8
Write 72.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 27.5
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.2
139% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown T4G86S1-H9M 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NEON HNM MODEL Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Axioo NEON HNM MODEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback