Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 20:22
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 195
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 604
58% 480 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.7% Below average
Lighting 57
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 79.9
46% 51.8 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11
Splatting 17.8
12% 14 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 451 282 271 270 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 463
Mixed 428
SusWrite 323
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 41.9
141% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 365
274% 365 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 77 78 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 51.4
Write 54.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 75.5
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
30GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 66 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 70.1
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 67.4
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 68%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 104 99 103 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.7% Average
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 98.9
142% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
548GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.9 0.5 0.6 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 0.9
98% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
708GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 1.8 1.1 1.1 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
Read 117
Write 111
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 1.7
102% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 95 103 99 102 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 98.2
135% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 32.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 DEL40F7 DELL P2717H
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback