VIT P2400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemVIT P2400  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-1485
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 05:58
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 114
55% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 166
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10C0) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4061
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 43 32 28 43 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 84.4
Write 74.1
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 36.8
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3150ED58E8W1600 Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P2400 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: VIT P2400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback