Acer Predator G5-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G5-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2C_SKS
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 22:37
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 551
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1179) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 63.4
50% 66.4 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 65.3
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-00000 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 25 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 426
Mixed 387
SusWrite 64.3
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 57.5
191% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 348
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 125%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
486GB free
Firmware: 12066712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 91 92 100 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 122
Write 65.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 94.8
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate USB 500GB
376GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 66.7
Write 31.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 75.4
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MK7559GSXF 750GB
258GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 24.5
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 36.7
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2666C18 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 27.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 120 27" 1280 720 ACR0510 Acer XB271H
Typical Predator G5-793 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer Predator G5-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback