Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 05:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,042
98% 815 Pts
64-Core 2,070
128% 2,070 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 312
Reflection 300
Parallax 329
254% 314 fps
Gravity 254
Splatting 188
191% 221 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1056 747 442 391 381 360 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 1,291
Mixed 398
SusWrite 563
138% 599 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 8.3
41% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 477
352% 458 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 448%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
999GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 80.7
Write 105
Mixed 81
SusWrite 99.9
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 92%
Amd-raid ST8000DM004-2CX1 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 177 175 173 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 63.4
Write 147
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 172
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 100%
Amd-raid KINGSTON RBU-SC4 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 505A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 133 133 135 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
Read 289
Write 154
Mixed 192
SusWrite 133
143% 192 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 7.1
1,241% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 117%
Seagate Innov8 8TB
263GB free
Firmware: CE07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 157 157 159 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 69.5
Write 149
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 154
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 86%
Amd-raid KingDian S100 16 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 73 73 74 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.6% Good
Read 134
Write 83.2
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 72.8
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 5.5
1,161% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Amd-raid ST14000DM001-2JC 14TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 181 180 179 179 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 200
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 178
116% 161 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
938% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 111%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 37.5
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 34
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 100 34.1" 1280 720 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback