Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B360M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360M-A  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 12:50
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$94
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 732
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$176
PNY(196E 1349) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.2% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 99.6
Parallax 65.4
65% 81.4 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 70.8
69% 86.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN4763
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 133 48 31 59 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 431
Write 407
Mixed 364
SusWrite 104
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 40.8
146% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 205
163% 224 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79%
Great: 106%
Corsair MP600 PRO 1TB
635GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2003 2151 2209 2280 2299 2334 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1,304
Write 1,223
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 2,213
368% 1,622 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 76.9
258% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,168
DQ Mixed 1,278
957% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 324%
Great: 463%
Nvme INTEL MEMPEK1J016GAH 14GB
13GB free
Firmware: K4110400 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 164 168 169 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 847
Write 161
Mixed 274
SusWrite 167
79% 362 MB/s
4K Read 131
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 94.9
357% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 284
272% 450 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 177%
Great: 258%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
919GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 88 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 82.7
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 89.9
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.C1GMM.AUW0C 78.C1GMS.40B2B 78.C1GMM.DFW0C 78.C1GMM.DFW0C 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 24.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B360M-A Builds (Compare 7,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-A - $495

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $814
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback