Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 23:14
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 805
87% 689 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 83.3
53% 69.8 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 44.6
45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 449
Mixed 299
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 39.9
135% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 233
198% 292 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 73%
Qemu HARDDISK 798GB
191GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 212 187 181 124 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
Read 499
Write 433
Mixed 431
SusWrite 205
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 29.2
128% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 187
182% 288 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 33
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 31.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback