Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2310M-$80 25,542 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 101 51% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 139 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1652) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2.2 2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 112 106 80 87 75 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.8% Average	Read 243 Write 149 Mixed 172 SusWrite 92.7 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 24.9 85% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 119 94% 129 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-042.A00LF 8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	243x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	95x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	87x

RAM
RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GBRamaxelBench 25%, 2,506 samples	26x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	18x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	13x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253