Today's hottest deals

Asus N53SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N53SM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N53SM
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 10:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 136
58% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 196
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Asus(1043 2114) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$30
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S86D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 239 242 242 191 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 465
Write 410
Mixed 399
SusWrite 239
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 35.2
113% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 117
133% 226 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H641GU67F7066G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N53SM Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N53SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback