Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,145
104% 873 Pts
64-Core 2,155
133% 2,155 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 117
Parallax 218
115% 158 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 155
Splatting 88.4
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1678 954 959 954 952 971 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,351
Write 3,718
Mixed 2,176
SusWrite 1078
526% 2,331 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 73.7
272% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,384
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,284
953% 1,263 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 299%
Great: 472%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
2TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 1416 1400 1396 1400 1404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,041
SusWrite 1,403
301% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 81
281% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 570
512% 776 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 272%
Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
1.5TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1324 1325 1338 1392 1390 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1,343
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 1,349
295% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 83.6
289% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 567
510% 776 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 271%
Great: 282%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 175 174 174 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 173
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 173
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 122 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 137
Write 119
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 121
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB
2GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 9.8 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 33.2
Write 12.9
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 11.3
23% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.6
239% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 19%
H/W RAID 0 16TB
10.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 241 231 239 247 244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.6% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 228
Mixed 122
SusWrite 240
278% 208 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 44.3
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 38.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $478

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback