Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 14:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 121
56% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 188
28% 200 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
ASRock(1849 990C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.5
0% 5.27 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 68 77 69 85 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 39
SusWrite 78
59% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 3.3 2.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 9.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.8
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback