Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 03:38
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 174
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 491
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 29
17% 21.9 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 14.2
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pichau Gaming PG256X 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 423 424 433 431 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 432
Write 405
Mixed 310
SusWrite 392
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 5.9
37% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 29.4
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback