Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateApr 26 '21 at 17:21
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 950
91% 752 Pts
64-Core 2,026
125% 2,026 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 113
Parallax 207
109% 151 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 147
Splatting 84.9
90% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1599 906 912 945 946 932 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,015
Write 2,532
Mixed 2,211
SusWrite 1,040
440% 1,949 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 72.9
270% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,223
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 1,250
907% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 277%
Great: 472%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
2TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 1342 1356 1368 1349 1269 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,237
Write 1,302
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 1,289
274% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 70.5
247% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 575
511% 769 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 243%
Great: 282%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
1.5TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1263 1296 1274 1335 1310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1354
Mixed 1,007
SusWrite 1,293
290% 1,289 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 72.2
258% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 929
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 566
508% 770 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 257%
Great: 282%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 150 148 159 160 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 135
Write 157
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 149
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 69 70 64 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 86.3
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 67.6
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 84%
H/W RAID 0 16TB
9TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 241 244 245 237 221 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 233
Mixed 115
SusWrite 228
272% 205 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 41.1
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 32.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $478

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback