MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 264%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 05:06
Run Duration478 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 165
2-Core 331
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,162
109% 904 Pts
64-Core 2,797
173% 2,797 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB; founders edition
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 296
Parallax 327
259% 314 fps
MRender 361
Gravity 261
Splatting 190
212% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$112
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2913 3057 3093 2802 1591 1577 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 2,895
Write 2,658
Mixed 2,812
SusWrite 2,505
612% 2,718 MB/s
4K Read 82.8
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 111
363% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 1,065
DQ Mixed 1,187
895% 1,205 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 436%
Great: 477%
Corsair Force 90GB
84GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Read 81.4
Write 33.9
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.5
7% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 47%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
119GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 273 273 274 273 273 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 422
Write 272
Mixed 296
SusWrite 273
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 25.6
85% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 148
128% 189 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
466GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2269 620 626 626 626 626 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 2,063
Mixed 1,632
SusWrite 899
397% 1,780 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 91.1
304% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,426
DQ Write 1167
DQ Mixed 1,265
956% 1,286 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 308%
Great: 340%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
174GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 98.6
Write 70.8
Mixed 50
SusWrite 74.3
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
510GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 96 97 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 19.7
Write 140
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 93.3
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 75
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 42.3
150% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 39.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 138%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,052
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback