Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 25.5
2-Core 50.3
30% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 93.5
8-Core 134
14% 114 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.7% Very good
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 108
Parallax 161
63% 115 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 132
Splatting 112
108% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
730GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 370 283 321 378 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 441
Write 422
Mixed 369
SusWrite 345
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 31.3
104% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 179
135% 181 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 117%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
245GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 364 355 267 276 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 426
Write 397
Mixed 368
SusWrite 318
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 24.7
88% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 188
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 104%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
185GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 262 269 265 275 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 398
Write 273
Mixed 294
SusWrite 268
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 17.6
75% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 172
133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 91%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 195
Write 71.5
Mixed 137
154% 134 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 8.7
785% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 10
904% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL15-17-17 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback