Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory39.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration416 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 272
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 825
86% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
MSI(1462 3980) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 134
Parallax 286
116% 188 fps
MRender 225
Gravity 143
Splatting 171
145% 180 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
927GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 472 475 487 480 480 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 284
Mixed 436
SusWrite 474
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 41.4
151% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 147
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
838GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 473 476 488 480 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 482
Mixed 396
SusWrite 475
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 49.7
174% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 119%
Great: 121%
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1222 1278 1104 1142 1141 986 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,400
Write 1,687
Mixed 1,818
SusWrite 1,146
394% 1,762 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 87.4
306% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1,053
798% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 308%
Great: 494%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
860GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2417 2222 1493 1507 1542 1525 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,302
Write 2,256
Mixed 1,737
SusWrite 1,784
454% 2,020 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 94.7
318% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1,028
777% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 346%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
838GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 511 512 513 511 513 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
External USB3.0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 741 747 746 750 737 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 86%
WD easystore 264D 18TB
13GB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 146 204 105 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 211
Write 208
Mixed 151
SusWrite 134
233% 176 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 2.5
368% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C18 Series Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 47GB
2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $743
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback