Today's hottest deals

Wacom Skylake

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemWacom Skylake  (all builds)
MotherboardInsyde MCALLAN
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161006
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 150
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Device(1B0A 01CF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 6.5
4% 8.07 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM280256GPMC15B-S10C4 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 282 152 187 240 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 324
Write 313
Mixed 257
SusWrite 232
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 7.9
51% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 167
168% 270 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 86%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 35 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 31.2
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 35.1
44% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NTD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 17.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback