Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.6
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 18:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 136
69% 110 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 219
40% 278 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9126
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 30
Parallax 4
2% 12.4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 214 214 216 214 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,159
Write 908
Mixed 814
SusWrite 241
174% 781 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 63.6
226% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 569
450% 627 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 160%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.6 Builds (Compare 786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback