Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory120.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration361 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$370
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 159
2-Core 315
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,202
108% 912 Pts
64-Core 1,814
112% 1,814 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$267
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 110
Parallax 112
94% 112 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 102
Splatting 95
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
780GB free
Firmware: RKT303.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1827 1054 1068 1085 1082 1079 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 2,481
Mixed 1,723
SusWrite 1,199
395% 1,746 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 68.7
225% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1,313
929% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 256%
Great: 303%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
698GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 396 348 338 358 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 476
Mixed 387
SusWrite 359
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 39.1
138% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 282
204% 270 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$154
938GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 462 464 461 471 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 471
Mixed 404
SusWrite 465
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 48.4
165% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 289
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
WDC WD140EMFZ-11A0WA0 14TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 182 136 137 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 172
Write 173
Mixed 137
SusWrite 162
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.2
13% 5.17 MB/s
DQ Read 6.2
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 1.3
3% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 26%
SABRENT 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2553 2597 1276 1122 1124 1125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$188
4TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 151 150 153 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
SONY WALKMAN 128GB
98GB free, PID 0ca0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 14 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 35.7
Write 23.8
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 14.9
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.7
377% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 6.4
498% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 54%
SONY WALKMAN 13GB
10GB free, PID 0ca0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 38
Write 30.7
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 34.2
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 11.2
889% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 14
982% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 23.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO Builds (Compare 3,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback