HP Mini 200-4200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Mini 200-4200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 338D
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 45.5
1-Core 7
2-Core 13.7
18% 22.1 Pts
4-Core 22.7
8-Core 22.4
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 22.8
1% 22.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 47 61 58 56 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 17.8
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 50.3
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873GB0-CH9 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 0
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback