Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive377% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 05:49
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 337
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,094
106% 870 Pts
64-Core 2,301
142% 2,301 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1594 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 126
Parallax 111
86% 114 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 108
Splatting 98.5
85% 105 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2614 2221 1527 1531 1533 1545 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2,671
Write 2,618
Mixed 1915
SusWrite 1,828
507% 2,258 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 98.2
332% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,145
DQ Mixed 1,248
936% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 377%
Great: 410%
Mushkin ECO3 480GB-$155
250GB free
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 155 78 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 485
Write 403
Mixed 365
SusWrite 146
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 42.6
144% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 181
138% 187 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
229GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 298 298 299 299 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 444
Mixed 418
SusWrite 316
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 59.4
195% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 201
144% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$100
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 125 129 122 122 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 119
Write 144
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 128
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.9
274% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 45.3
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 41.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 136%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $887
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback