Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 15:12
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 181
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 474
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1563) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1053 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 19.7
18% 22.4 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 24
20% 25.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB
38GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 512
Write 121
Mixed 180
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 13.9
87% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 38.6
55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 77%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 433
Write 69.4
Mixed 110
44% 204 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 15
91% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 41.2
65% 131 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 131
Mixed 98.5
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.29
112% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 84%
Lexar CFUDMASD 4GB
4GB free, PID b035
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.61% Terrible
Read 16.6
Write 10.6
Mixed 10.9
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.57
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
14% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback