Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UF
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 01:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 125
52% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 238
25% 201 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1A1E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 8.57 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 64 54 41 30 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback