HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 16:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 254
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 616
70% 548 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 844F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8189
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 27
Parallax 8.2
5% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg5aznv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 354 387 339 342 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 357
Mixed 416
SusWrite 366
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 44.3
157% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 340
301% 451 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 200%
takeMS USB Mini 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.7 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 36
Write 8.8
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8.4
15% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback