Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 08:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 61.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
71% 132 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 544
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 52
48% 58.2 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 49.5
39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1023 1006 1143 472 175 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,599
Write 1,281
Mixed 987
SusWrite 666
253% 1,133 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 25.9
175% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 358
329% 492 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 180%
Great: 180%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
755GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 121 123 121 122 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 94.6
Write 101
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 119
63% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 78.C2GF4.AU30B 12GB
3200, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback