EVGA 131-IB-E695

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemEVGA E695 0.0
MotherboardEVGA 131-IB-E695  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 586
63% 499 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 67.9
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 91.3
55% 72.4 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 46.4
48% 60.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
838GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 241 242 243 242 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.8% Very good
Read 260
Write 242
Mixed 237
SusWrite 240
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 36
118% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 121%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 356
Mixed 209
76% 346 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 30.2
107% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 151
153% 250 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
390GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 59 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 54.4
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 59.5
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 131-IB-E695 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA 131-IB-E695

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback