Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 10:49
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 60
32% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 137
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Nvidia(10DE 058F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 1.8
4% 6 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 7
Splatting 5.6
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 127 125 61 42 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 218
Write 146
Mixed 202
SusWrite 88.9
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 19.3
70% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 37
70% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
10GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 91 99 98 99 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 93
Write 61
Mixed 22
SusWrite 95.2
49% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
6GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 41.8
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 500GB
31GB free, PID 3000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 4
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 19.7
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 17%
USB DISK Pro 4GB
4GB free, PID 3e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Read 15
Write 7.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.6
10% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback