Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 15:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$106
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 672
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 37.4
28% 37.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
980plus 2.5" SATA3-128GB SSD 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 60 72 73 54 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 502
Write 424
Mixed 402
SusWrite 78.1
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 27.3
124% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 43.9
87% 170 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
193GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 136 144 144 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 164
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 142
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback