Today's hottest deals

HP Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8648
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 131
48% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 229
33% 242 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 8648) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3.8
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 4
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 169 171 145 163 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 179
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 155
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback