Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 767
69% 584 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 99.7
Parallax 91.8
73% 93.6 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 89.6
73% 89.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 182 188 181 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 388
Write 230
Mixed 257
SusWrite 177
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 32.7
120% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 250
186% 246 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
6GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 85 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 81.7
Write 83.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 84.2
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
106GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 89.5
Mixed 56
SusWrite 99.3
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
124GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 61 66 61 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42% Average
Read 84.7
Write 85
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 61.4
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.5% Very good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback