Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 03:56
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 301
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,150
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,733
107% 1,733 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 193
Parallax 190
174% 199 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 145
Splatting 130
123% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$430
1TB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 433 430 436 436 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 432
Mixed 429
SusWrite 426
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 49.4
165% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 153
106% 131 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 102%
Great: 131%
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
282GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 810 728 688 745 728 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,976
Write 2,012
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 820
363% 1,617 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 71.6
246% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 951
716% 960 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 248%
Great: 296%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
233GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 316 316 316 316 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,803
Write 1,381
Mixed 691
SusWrite 488
242% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 56
205% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 674
576% 847 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 206%
Great: 236%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,975
Write 1,828
Mixed 3,036
2,225% 2,946 MB/s
4K Read 73.6
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 63.4
11,328% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 237
2,060% 211 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 46
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 124%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $368
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback