Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory10.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1189 x 743 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime44.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 00:48
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 148
56% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 260
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 537GB
103GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 4.4 3.8 3.9 5.1 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.58% Terrible
Read 128
Write 43.9
Mixed 59
SusWrite 4.9
13% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.2
11% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 65%
Vmware Virtual disk 123GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.4 6.5 6.8 7.3 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
Read 103
Write 60.7
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 7.5
50% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.4
645% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 73%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 81GB
44GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.5 2.9 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.5% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 38.5
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 2.9
29% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.8
605% 3.63 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 54GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 5.1 4.6 4.5 5.7 6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Read 103
Write 40.1
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 5.4
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.5
733% 4.23 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 54GB
46GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.1 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.3% Below average
Read 115
Write 45.9
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 3
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.3
344% 2.43 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 54GB
49GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.2 2.9 2.9 3.8 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
Read 104
Write 46
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 3
41% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.2
399% 2.3 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 2.8 2.7 1.4 4.2 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 36
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 4.1
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 64 slots used
64GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 40
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback