Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '21 at 16:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 387
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 3801) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.4% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 48.7
48% 54.6 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 45.5
38% 46.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Longline SSD 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 91 47 10 43 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 450
Write 391
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 78.1
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.7
34% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 91.1
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
13% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
921GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 203 199 203 205 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 159
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 202
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback