Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 10:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 134
52% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 586
46% 409 Pts
64-Core 2,794
173% 2,794 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1595 MHz, MLim: 1762 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.8% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 75.7
47% 69.6 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 67
Splatting 59.9
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1300 1265 816 824 819 821 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,183
Write 1,862
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 974
366% 1,635 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 69.1
228% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 664
491% 650 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 246%
Great: 346%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
159GB free
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 267 78 43 42 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 422
Write 308
Mixed 276
SusWrite 116
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 26.8
92% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 119
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 100%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB
860GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 86.4
Write 87.5
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 84.6
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
113GB free
Firmware: FB2OC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 48.9
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 53
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 31%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 25.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback