Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200623
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '21 at 09:17
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 1,324 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 795 70% 596 Pts	64-Core 1,003 62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.6% Very good	Lighting 94.9 Reflection 106 Parallax 97.9 77% 99.5 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 95.8 Splatting 95.2 78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 210 211 215 209 177 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 366 Write 254 Mixed 266 SusWrite 206 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 37.2 136% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 260 196% 265 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 6GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 85 84 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 80.5 Write 78 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 84.2 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 106GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 100 100 101 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 98 Write 88.3 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 99 65% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 166GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 64 59 63 62 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 94.8 Write 78.8 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 60.9 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- 3x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.5% Very good	MC Read 37 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 26.6 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	273x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	147x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	128x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	115x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	111x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	36x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	128x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	64x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353